2. CARE’s policy
CARE’s new policy framework for relations with military forces was approved by the CI Board in June 2009. Download the full policy framework for complete details.
Key points stated in the policy framework include:
- The humanitarian and military actors have fundamentally different institutional thinking and cultures, and the two groups have different mandates, competencies objectives and modus operandi, which should not be confused.
- CARE’s decisions about how it interacts with the military should always be consistent with its principles and obligations. There are five organisational principles (described in more detail further below) that are central in defining CARE as a non-governmental organisation engaged in humanitarian action.
- Humanitarian imperative
- Safety and security of staff
- Humanitarian principles constitute the core basis for CARE’s ability to work safely and effectively in conflict. While the threats confronting aid agencies are manifold, the safety and security of CARE’s staff, programmes and beneficiaries is contingent on CARE’s neutrality, impartiality and independence from military operations. Inappropriate interactions or the perception of blurred lines between humanitarian and military actors can undermine aid agencies’ acceptance among local populations and parties to the conflict as well as increase the level of insecurity. The unintended negative consequences of associations between aid programmes and military forces can outweigh any short-term benefits.
- CARE also recognises that military forces have obligations related to humanitarian assistance and protection of civilian populations, as established by international humanitarian law and customary law. Under certain circumstances, the military may provide assistance or support relief operations. In such contexts, military involvement in relief operations should always respect the principle of distinction between military and humanitarian operations.
- CARE will strive to develop joint approaches with other aid agencies to civil-military relations.