4. Commitments on Humanitarian Quality and Accountability
The nine Commitments on Humanitarian Quality and Accountability included in CARE’s Humanitarian and Accountability Framework (HAF) are in principle the same set out in the Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS).
The Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS),launched in December 2014, is a set of nine Commitments to communities and people affected by crisis that encapsulate principled, accountable and good quality humanitarian action. While a voluntary code for humanitarian actors at present, the CHS aims to become a means of certification of agencies delivering humanitarian aid. CARE contributed to the development of the CHS and became a founding member of the CHS Alliance in June 2015.
The CHS replaces the 2010 HAP Standards, People in Aid Code of Good Practice and (in 2017) Sphere Project core standards, but sits alongside the Sphere Project Technical Standards and Code of Conduct for the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and NGOs in Disaster Relief as an inter-agency humanitarian standard.
While the CHS is intended in part to consolidate the very many standards that have been produced to guide global humanitarian programming over recent decades, its raison d’être is to facilitate greater accountability to people affected by crisis because ‘knowing what humanitarian organisations have committed to will enable them to hold those organisations to account’. The CHS, in other words, places people affected by crisis at the centre of humanitarian action and promotes respect for their fundamental human rights.
For more general information about the CHS refer to the CHS Guidance Note and Indicators; FAQs about the CHS and Sphere; and the CHS folder in Minerva, which also includes FAQs about the CHS and CARE
Each CHS Commitment includes its own set of Performance Indicators, Key Actions and Organisational Responsibilities against which CARE is able to test and demonstrate its compliance.
As a founding member of the CHS Alliance CARE is also committed to contribute to the constant improvement of CHS verification tools and mechanisms. Therefore CARE might decide to adapt any of the CHS quality criteria and particularly the CHS indicators when we deem it appropriate in order to reflect CARE’s specific aspirations especially with regards to gender equality and women’s voice as well as on inclusive governance. In any case, CARE will consider and respect CHS indicators as the minimum standard.
| Commitment | Quality Criterion | |
Communities and people affected by crisis… |
||
| 1 | …receive assistance appropriate and relevant to their needs | Humanitarian response is appropriate and relevant |
| 2 | …have access to the humanitarian assistance they need at the right time | Humanitarian response is effective and timely |
| 3 | …are not negatively affected and are more prepared, resilient and less at-risk as a result of humanitarian action | Humanitarian response strengthens local capacities and avoids negative effects |
| 4 | …know their rights and entitlements, have access to information and participate in decisions that affect them | Humanitarian response is based on communication, participation and feedback |
| 5 | …have access to safe and responsive mechanisms to handle complaints | Complaints are welcomed and addressed |
| 6 | …receive coordinated, complementary assistance | Humanitarian response is coordinated and complementary |
| 7 | … can expect delivery of improved assistance | Humanitarian actors continuously learn and improve |
| 8 | …receive the assistance they require from competent and well-managed staff and volunteers | Staff are supported to do their job effectively, and are treated fairly and equitably |
| 9 | …can expect that the organisations assisting them are managing resources effectively, efficiently and ethically | Resources are managed and used responsibly for their intended purpose |
Refer to the generic CHS Guidance Note and Indicators and CHS self-assessment tool for further details and guidance relating to the monitoring of each Commitment.
In CARE performance of a response against these quality criteria is measured through ongoing monitoring (see M&E chapter), Rapid Accountability Reviews (RAR) and CHS verification processes, as described in the HAF Accountability System section below. Please also refer to the CHS Scorecard for a snapshot of CARE’s performance against these
CARE is committed not only to upholding and promoting high standards of quality and accountability in its humanitarian programming, but also to demonstrating its own best practice. CARE is required to follow the four-stage CHS Verification Scheme, managed by the CHS Alliance – self-assessment, peer review, independent verification and certification – which allows it to measure and evidence its compliance with CHS Commitments at varied levels of rigour and objectivity.
The CHS self-assessment tool guides organisations through the collection of evidence including structured feedback from staff, partners and people affected by crisism generated from the monitoring and evaluation of humanitarian actions as well as from the review of documented organisational policies and procedures. the tool includes a scorecard whereby top-line scores against each of the nine Commitments as well as scores for diversity and for every Performance Indicator, Key Action and Organisational Responsibility that fall under each Commitment are generated.
In CARE’s case and for the sake of efficiency and complementarity, CHS verification processes will benefit from existing process and tools:
- CHS Key Actions: Routine monitoring and evaluation and particularly Rapid Accountability Reviews (RAR) which take place during each CARE emergency response and are centred around the nine CHS Commitments will generate the core of the required data and documentation.
- CHS Organisational Responsibilities: Lessons and recommendations from After Action Reviews and response evaluations will ensure that CHS verification processes are rooted in the real, current experience across emergencies and across the CARE confederation.
For further details about the link between CARE’s accountability processes and CHS assessments refer to section 6 (HAF Accountability System).
Under the leadership of the CARE Emergency Group (CEG), CARE will complete its first CHS self-assessment by June 2017 and will then set out a timeline and process for achieving full CHS certification.
